On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 02:44:44PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> There are already loads of bugreports like that filed against
> webalizer, because people don't seem to bother checking the existing
> bugreports before fileing yet another one, and, worse, people are
> getting angry when you don
On 2904T14+0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> getting angry when you don't reply to their requests within one hour,
> even if you are 'on leave' as stated on db.debian.org.
Nondevelopers do not have access to the away information in db.d.o.
--
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % [EMAIL PROTECTED
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based
> > libgd and renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I personally don't
> > think that this was a good idea as it might cause problems during
> > upgrades).
>
> Do I interpret this right that I should file a
Please refrain from Cc:ing me - I _do_ read the lists I'm posting to
*sigh* It seems that that can't be said often enough.
On 04 Sep 2000, Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based libgd and
> renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> webalizer and linuxconf now depends on libgd1g, which currently isn't
> anymore available from our ftp-servers.
Not any longer. The newest linuxconf package in woody depends on the
new libgd1:
Package: linuxconf
[...]
Version: 1.20r2-1
Depends: netbase (>= 3.16-1), logrot
5 matches
Mail list logo
