Re: libcurl and moc

On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 07:47:15PM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > > It may be worthwhile to simply survey all the curl-using packages in > > sarge, though, and find out if there is a non-zero number of them that > > need SSL_CTX_FUNCTION. If *not*, then I don't think there's much sense > > in

Re: libcurl and moc

FWIW, I've started work on implementing the solution outlined in . However, my spare time is very limited, so I can't promise anything about when (or even whether) I can finish this. Richard -- __ _ |_) /| Richard Atterer | GnuPG key

Re: libcurl and moc

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 05:02:14AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:16:48AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: >> As far as packaging goes, this means you get the following packages: >> libcurl3, providing libcurl3-openssl (linked against OpenSSL to avoid >> breaking >>

Re: libcurl and moc

On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 08:16:48AM +1000, Paul TBBle Hampson wrote: > As far as packaging goes, this means you get the following packages: > libcurl3, providing libcurl3-openssl (linked against OpenSSL to avoid breaking > sarge packages that use this functionality) > libcurl3-gnutls (linked

Re: libcurl and moc

On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 06:51:20PM +0200, Richard Atterer wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> But no one has yet answered my question: *why* are there ABI > >> differences between the gnutls and openssl builds? > To the best of my knowledge (I could be w

Re: libcurl and moc

> On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 04:04:27AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > But no one has yet answered my question: *why* are there ABI > > differences between the gnutls and openssl builds? To the best of my knowledge (I could be wrong), ATM the only ABI difference is that when OpenSSL is used, curl_