On Oct 26, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe hurd and m68k porters can maintain a glibc package using an old
> version (2.3.6 ??) together? Well that's for after Etch.
What for? Modern threaded software will require TLS more and more.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: D
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the releas
Thomas Schwinge a écrit :
> Hello!
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
>>> haven't received any answer.
>
> That is untrue
Hello!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I
> > haven't received any answer.
That is untrue. I replied for the Hurd people.
>
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the release of etch.
>
> This version works on all architectures, but m68k, hurd and hppa which
> don't have TLS support.
>
> For hppa the work is almost done, I am currently building the p
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:08PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an
> unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will
> see m68k in relase shape?
That's exactly what we're planning to do.
--
Home is where you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>> Ron Johnson a écrit :
On 10/25/06 04:53, Mar
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 20:42, Kevin Mark wrote:
> When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an
> unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will
> see m68k in relase shape?
AMD64 is a modern architecture. M68k is an architecture that saw its pr
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Ron Johnson a écrit :
> >>
> >> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> >>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
> [
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/2006 11:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
>>>Ron Johnson a écrit :
>>>
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
>
> [snip]
>
>>>For m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ron Johnson a écrit :
>>
>> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
[snip]
> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago,
Ron Johnson a écrit :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
>>> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
>> No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
>> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
>
> No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in
> at t
* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 11:37]:
> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 11:48]:
> > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
> libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no.
2.5 came out a few days ago.
--
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRI
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]:
> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in
at this point of the release cycle. In fact, we don't even have 2.4
because there are a number of arch
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:36:42AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch?
libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no.
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
17 matches
Mail list logo