Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Oct 26, Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Maybe hurd and m68k porters can maintain a glibc package using an old > version (2.3.6 ??) together? Well that's for after Etch. What for? Modern threaded software will require TLS more and more. -- ciao, Marco signature.asc Description: D

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Barry deFreese
- Original Message - From: "Michael Banck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Cc: Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 11:45 AM Subject: Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the releas

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Thomas Schwinge a écrit : > Hello! > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I >>> haven't received any answer. > > That is untrue

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 05:45:24PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago, I > > haven't received any answer. That is untrue. I replied for the Hurd people. >

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Michael Banck
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:27:07PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > We plan to upload [glibc-2.5] right after the release of etch. > > This version works on all architectures, but m68k, hurd and hppa which > don't have TLS support. > > For hppa the work is almost done, I am currently building the p

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:42:08PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote: > When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an > unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will > see m68k in relase shape? That's exactly what we're planning to do. -- Home is where you

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-26 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 21:42, Kevin Mark wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >>> Ron Johnson a écrit : On 10/25/06 04:53, Mar

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Warren Turkal
On Wednesday 25 October 2006 20:42, Kevin Mark wrote: > When Sarge was released, amd64 was not officially released but had an > unofficial release. why not do the same with the hopes tha etch+1 will > see m68k in relase shape? AMD64 is a modern architecture. M68k is an architecture that saw its pr

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Kevin Mark
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:21:39AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Ron Johnson a écrit : > >> > >> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > >>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > [

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/2006 11:21 AM, Ron Johnson wrote: > On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > >>>Ron Johnson a écrit : >>> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > > [snip] > >>>For m

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 06:27, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Ron Johnson a écrit : >> >> On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >>> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: [snip] > For m68k and hurd, I have sent a mail to the porters a few months ago,

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Ron Johnson a écrit : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: >> * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: >>> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? >> No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely n

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Ron Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/25/06 04:53, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: >> Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? > > No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in > at t

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Andreas Barth
* Ron Johnson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061025 11:37]: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No. Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 11:48]: > > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? > libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. 2.5 came out a few days ago. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-25 04:36]: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? No, of course not. We cannot put a copletely new and untested libc in at this point of the release cycle. In fact, we don't even have 2.4 because there are a number of arch

Re: libc6 2.5 and Etch

2006-10-25 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 04:36:42AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > Is there any reasonable possibility that it will make it into Etch? libc6 is frozen (at 2.3.x -- I assume you mean 2.4, not 2.5?), so no. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE