Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Rob Browning
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But I get these errors: > > In file included from /usr/include/g++-2/stl_rope.h:2107, > from /usr/include/g++-2/rope.h:18, > from blah.cc:1: > /usr/include/g++-2/ropeimpl.h:1085: warning: decimal integer constant is so > large

Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 12 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:24:49AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote: > > > > > void main(void) > > > > > > > > BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of > > the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return vo

Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Chris Leishman
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 08:24:49AM +0100, M.C. Vernon wrote: > > > void main(void) > > > > BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of > the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void > in a number of texts though. > > HTH, > > Matthew >

Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread M.C. Vernon
> void main(void) BTW, main returns int, not void. See the comp.lang.c FAQ for the bit of the C standard that defines this - main is incorrectly said to return void in a number of texts though. HTH, Matthew -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Steward of the Cambridge Tolkien Society Selwyn Col

Re: Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Chris
Sorry to follow myself up so quickly, but I found the fault. The ropeimpl.h file is in error complared to the version from SGI's STL. Here's the diff: --- ropeimpl.h.orig Mon Oct 12 14:18:53 1998 +++ ropeimpl.h Mon Oct 12 14:17:25 1998 @@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ /* 35 */24157817, /* 36 */39088

Ropes in stl (was Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev)

1998-10-12 Thread Chris
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 01:42:20PM +, Rob Browning wrote: > Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > See http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL for the current STL implementation. > > And see > > http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/string_discussion.html > > for why you should probably be using

Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev

1998-10-11 Thread Rob Browning
Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > See http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL for the current STL implementation. And see http://www.sgi.com/Technology/STL/string_discussion.html for why you should probably be using ropes or vector instead. We tend to use typedef rope string; now. The code

Re: lack of wstring in libstdc++2.8-dev

1998-10-10 Thread Chris
On Fri, Oct 09, 1998 at 07:22:07PM -0700, Jeff McWilliams wrote: > Hi, > > I've got g++ 2.9.29-0.6, the egcs compiler, and libstdc++2.8dev > 2.9.29-0.6 installed. I was playing around with some STL stuff when I > tried to declare a wstring. No luck. > > Examining the file /usr/include/g++/stri