Re: lack of replacement for linux-vserver

2012-02-02 Thread Micah Anderson
Bernd Zeimetz writes: > On 01/31/2012 10:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [...] >> If anyone wishes to volunteer to maintain VServer in Debian - you are >> very welcome, but please start by addressing the bugs filed against >> them in squeeze and reviewing the existing conflicts. If you can >> prov

Re: lack of replacement for linux-vserver

2012-02-01 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 01/31/2012 10:37 PM, Ben Hutchings wrote: [...] > If anyone wishes to volunteer to maintain VServer in Debian - you are > very welcome, but please start by addressing the bugs filed against > them in squeeze and reviewing the existing conflicts. If you can > prove yourself by doing that, then y

Re: lack of replacement for linux-vserver

2012-02-01 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mer., 2012-02-01 at 10:33 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > Just to be clear, 'that work' is not just a matter of forwarding > > messages back and forward between the Debian BTS and the Linux-VServer > > developers. Unless the VServer project

Re: lack of replacement for linux-vserver

2012-01-31 Thread Paul Wise
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:37 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Just to be clear, 'that work' is not just a matter of forwarding > messages back and forward between the Debian BTS and the Linux-VServer > developers.  Unless the VServer project continues to support whichever > version we use in a stable rel

Re: lack of replacement for linux-vserver

2012-01-31 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 07:48:02PM +, Andrei Morgan wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been aware for a few years that linux-vserver was planned to be > dropped from the next stable release in favour of 'lxc' as a > replacement solution. > > As I believe has been recently discussed on this list, lxc