Re: killall is removed from procps

1998-01-04 Thread csmall
Joey Hess wrote: > BTW, could you make a procps-dev package with a libproc.a, and libproc's .h > files in it? I need this for a package I would like to make called > w.bassman, it's a different version of 'w', that links with libproc, and > needs whattime.h to build. This would be the libproc-dev p

Re: killall is removed from procps

1998-01-02 Thread Raul Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two options: > I merge the psmic into procps > I create a new package called psmisc. procps is required. pure compatability would argue that psmisc also be required (or something very close). -- Raul -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST:

Re: killall is removed from procps

1998-01-02 Thread bruce
Nobody's going to be upset if you create the new package. I think you should go ahead. Thanks Bruce -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .

Re: killall is removed from procps

1998-01-02 Thread Joey Hess
BTW, could you make a procps-dev package with a libproc.a, and libproc's .h files in it? I need this for a package I would like to make called w.bassman, it's a different version of 'w', that links with libproc, and needs whattime.h to build. -- see shy jo -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LI

Re: killall is removed from procps

1998-01-01 Thread Joey Hess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > will NOT HAVE KILLALL. I think this is probably a Bad Thing. > > Two options: > I merge the psmic into procps > I create a new package called psmisc. The second, and make procps recommend or suggest the new psmisc package. -- see shy jo -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM T