> "Herbert" == Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Herbert> I doubt the increase is going to be that significant.
Herbert> Since most of these will eventually become part of the
Herbert> mainstream kernel or get dropped.
I hope that is not actually the trend we see.
>> im
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:57:18AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > > Who says you have to compile debian packages on only machines you own?
> >
> > So tell elmo to get me through, and not, not do anything for 2 months. The
> > only other faster machines I
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Who says you have to compile debian packages on only machines you own?
>
> So tell elmo to get me through, and not, not do anything for 2 months. The
> only other faster machines I have access to, run RedHat or Mandrake, and I
> can't afford anything be
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 02:40:27AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Daniel Stone wrote:
> > Linux Kernel Developer
>
> I love this.. the only mention of 'daniel.*stone' in the entire
> kernel is a trivial patch to drivers/sound/sb_card.c..
Plus, numerous Netfilter things, which I have
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 09:33:13AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:15:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > I think your concerns are not well-founded. If you have a sane build
> > > system, then building them is as simple as a fo
Previously Daniel Stone wrote:
> Linux Kernel Developer
I love this.. the only mention of 'daniel.*stone' in the entire
kernel is a trivial patch to drivers/sound/sb_card.c..
Wichert.
--
/ Generally uninteresting signature - i
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:15:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > I think your concerns are not well-founded. If you have a sane build
> > system, then building them is as simple as a for loop. Have look at the
> > way kernel-image-i386 is built if you do
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 10:31:06AM +1000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:15:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > I think your concerns are not well-founded. If you have a sane build
> > system, then building them is as simple as a for loop. Have look at the
> > way kernel-image-i38
On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:15:09AM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> I think your concerns are not well-founded. If you have a sane build
> system, then building them is as simple as a for loop. Have look at the
> way kernel-image-i386 is built if you don't understand what I'm talking
> about.
Not ever
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:34:40PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> placed by this scheme. My assumption is that there will be different
> modversions for each kernel configuration and that as such, I will
That's correct.
> then my module-specific concerns go away. Even if you accept that the
> b
[I'm responding to Herbert directly to draw attention to this question
and make sure I get a response from him. I have also read the rest of
this thread even though I am responding to a fairly early message. ]
I'm approaching this as the maintainer of the openafs package, which
has a kernel mod
11 matches
Mail list logo
