Re: is dhelp completely broken

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Marillat
"SH" == Stefan Hornburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Christian, please make the NMU. It would be nice if the package is > working now. > If you are _really_ kind, put > Stefan Hornburg (Racke) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > as maintainer in changelog/control, send the packages to me, and >

Re: is dhelp completely broken

2001-09-24 Thread Stefan Hornburg Racke
Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because

Re: is dhelp completely broken

2001-09-24 Thread Christian Marillat
"CW" == Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: >> "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem >> > described in bug reports 109207, 10984

Re: is dhelp completely broken

2001-09-23 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 05:58:39PM +0200, Christian Marillat wrote: > "JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem > > described in bug reports 109207, 109849, 110411, 110433, 110538, > > 111044, 112614, and 112659.

Re: is dhelp completely broken

2001-09-23 Thread Christian Marillat
"JV" == Jochen Voss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, Hi, > for me the dhelp package does not work at all, because of the problem > described in bug reports 109207, 109849, 110411, 110433, 110538, > 111044, 112614, and 112659. My question is, does the package work for > anybody at all? Is