On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:47:21AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> /usr/sbin/update-inetd is moved from netbase to update-inetd.
> Daemons can continue depending on netbase or switch to depend on
> inet-superserver,
[...]
> etch
> netbase
> Depends: inet-superserver, lots of other st
This is my revised plan, where update-inetd will be moved to its own
package to be depended on by the inetds which want it (the others will
need to provide their own version of the command).
Please comment now, because I want to upload the package ASAP.
sarge
netbase
Depends: op
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 14:22:07 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 30, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that duplicating update-inetd in most of the
> > inetd providing packages is a good idea, even if this would allow
> > xinetd to be able to replace a normal inetd easily. I'd prefer tha
On Aug 30, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that duplicating update-inetd in most of the
> inetd providing packages is a good idea, even if this would allow
> xinetd to be able to replace a normal inetd easily. I'd prefer that the
> odd cases override update-inetd, via
On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 12:27:43 +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 28, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > Just yesterday night dato raised the issue on #d-release, and I was
> > telling about the virtual package, and that we could move to it now,
> > and worry later about a possible transition to that new up
5 matches
Mail list logo
