Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-18 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:53:49 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Let's stop the mutual accusation part of this thread. P.S. Didn't mean to make anybody upset; I was a little bit tired back then, and I'm sorry that affected the way of me communicating with people. -- WBR, Andrew signatu

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:36:48AM +0200, Andrew Shadura wrote: > > It sounds to me that you have broken this behavior on purpose, where > > you could instead have added an interface to make disabling an > > interface more convenient than sed hackery (as mandated by policy). > > No. Also I'd like

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-18 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:23:25 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 16 juin 2012 à 19:38 +0200, Andrew Shadura a écrit : > > Also, it's network-manager who tries to be a replacement somehow > > compatible with ifupdown, not vice versa, so NM maintainers should > > take care of their p

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-18 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le samedi 16 juin 2012 à 19:38 +0200, Andrew Shadura a écrit : > Also, it's network-manager who tries to be a replacement somehow > compatible with ifupdown, not vice versa, so NM maintainers should take > care of their package to do things are they're supposed to be done in > a compatible way. N

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-17 Thread Neil Williams
On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:33:27 +0200 Andrew Shadura wrote: > > If it is a bug in NetworkManager, then please show me where. > > auto eth0 > > #NetworkManager#iface eth0 ... > > is not a valid syntax. > > So when we have interfaces 'defined' like this, initscripts' hook > thinks we've got all 0 i

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-16 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:05:06 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > If you suddenly decide to change the behaviour of ifupdown, then > please co-ordinate such a change and get affected packages fixed > beforehand. And let packages know what they need to change. Also, it's network-manager who tries

Re: ifupdown's changed hook handling breaks other packages.

2012-06-16 Thread Andrew Shadura
Hello, On Sat, 16 Jun 2012 19:05:06 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote: > > Reassigning it back as it really is a bug in NetworkManager. > I've asked for further justification. > Just saying "really" isn't. > If it is a bug in NetworkManager, then please show me where. auto eth0 #NetworkManager#iface