Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package

2008-05-09 Thread Giovanni Mascellani
All'incirca Tue, 06 May 2008 19:14:26 +0200, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto: > > And moreover, I am afraid that sunpinyin-{le,ge}-data are not > > architecture neutral. So is it okay to make these two packages > > Arch:all? > > Yes. I'm not involved in sunpinyin, but

Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package

2008-05-08 Thread Kov Chai
Thanks a lot, JB. Following your hints, I am almost there. :) And sorry for the multi-post... On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Kov Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named > > sun

Re: how to split architecture dependent data files into separate package

2008-05-06 Thread Julien BLACHE
"Kov Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, > best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named > sunpinyin-le-data and sunpinyin-ge-data, and make the binary packages depend > on the data package by its endianness accordingly. > > Is this solution feasible, or is there any better