All'incirca Tue, 06 May 2008 19:14:26 +0200, Julien BLACHE
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sembrerebbe aver scritto:
> > And moreover, I am afraid that sunpinyin-{le,ge}-data are not
> > architecture neutral. So is it okay to make these two packages
> > Arch:all?
>
> Yes.
I'm not involved in sunpinyin, but
Thanks a lot, JB. Following your hints, I am almost there. :)
And sorry for the multi-post...
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Julien BLACHE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Kov Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named
> > sun
"Kov Chai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> best approach in my mind is to create two other data packages named
> sunpinyin-le-data and sunpinyin-ge-data, and make the binary packages depend
> on the data package by its endianness accordingly.
>
> Is this solution feasible, or is there any better
3 matches
Mail list logo