Hello,
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 10:23:47PM -0500, Ben Burton wrote:
> Hi.. I've never done this myself, but I'm sure I've seen it happen in the
> past: If you're replacing foo with newfoo, you upload a new dummy package
> foo that contains absolutely nothing, but depends on newfoo. This way
>
> Thanks, - I know this and have done it previously in the case of
> zicq and krolden. However, what I really wanted to know is, how
> this (or any other) procedure can take care that the users of the
> old package will get the renamed package automatically updated with
> 'apt-get upgrade'?
Oh,
> Thanks, - I know this and have done it previously in the case of
> zicq and krolden. However, what I really wanted to know is, how
> this (or any other) procedure can take care that the users of the
> old package will get the renamed package automatically updated with
> 'apt-get upgrade'? Other
Hi,
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 12:39:48PM -0700, David Whedon wrote:
> This is discussed in the Developer's Reference [1]:
>
> 9.3 Replacing or renaming packages
>
> Sometimes you made a mistake naming the package and you need to rename it. In
> this case, you need to follow a two-step process. Fir
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 12:39:48PM -0700, David Whedon wrote:
> Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:43:30PM +0200 wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am maintaing the Debian package puzzle and have a problem
> > with the new upstream version. The package and program has been
> > renamed by upstream to tree-puzzle, be
Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:43:30PM +0200 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am maintaing the Debian package puzzle and have a problem
> with the new upstream version. The package and program has been
> renamed by upstream to tree-puzzle, because there was a conflict
> with another program named puzzle.
> I was co
6 matches
Mail list logo
