Bastian Venthur wrote:
> What is the preferred solution for this kind of problem?
>
>
I've heard rumors that packages have a Description: field which could
probably contain a note along the lines of:
WordPress requires access to a local or remote MySQL server. If you
wish to run the s
On 25-Jul-06, 10:14 (CDT), Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Wuertele wrote:
> But how can a user mark the sql-server as
> installed-to-satisfy-dependency? I mean when I remove wordpress (or some
> similar package) mysql-server won't be removed until I do it manually.
> Wasn't th
Martin Wuertele wrote:
>> What is the preferred solution for this kind of problem?
>
> Wordpress already suggests virtual-mysql-server which is imo sufficient.
> There might be arguments to raise this to recommends however I don't see
> the need for 2 packages. It might make sense to mention the
On 7/25/06, Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An alternative would be to have a pseudo-package (or however we name it)
mysql-server-remote that a local admin installs to tell dpkg that it
should never install a local server. I'm not sure this is a typical use
case, but the principle might
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 09:49:06 +0100
Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How about:
>
> Depends: mysql-remote-server | mysql-server
>
> Then create a dummy "mysql-remote-server" package which (possibly
> conflicts with mysql-server) could be used to satisfy dependencies
> only?
If
Michal Čihař <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all
>
> On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:12:24 +0200
> Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Since wordpress is not the only package depending on mysql-server, I'd
>> like to ask how other developers dealt with this problem?
>>
>> My proposal to satisf
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 10:12 +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> I recently stumbled upon a bug (#379561) in wordpress. Wordpress depends
> on a mysql-server installed in order to run, but the Debian package
> wordpress does not.
> I filled a bugreport and the answer was that some users might want to
>
On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:21:03AM +0200, Michal ??iha?? wrote:
> > My proposal to satisfy both use-cases was, to provide two versions of
> > wordpress:
> > (1) wordpress -- depends on mysql-server
> > (2) wordpress-remotesql -- does not
How about:
Depends: mysql-remote-server | mysql-serv
* Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-25 10:12]:
> I recently stumbled upon a bug (#379561) in wordpress. Wordpress depends
> on a mysql-server installed in order to run, but the Debian package
> wordpress does not.
>
> I filled a bugreport and the answer was that some users might want t
Hi all
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 10:12:24 +0200
Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since wordpress is not the only package depending on mysql-server, I'd
> like to ask how other developers dealt with this problem?
>
> My proposal to satisfy both use-cases was, to provide two versions of
> wo
10 matches
Mail list logo