22.01.2010 16:41, Jérémy Lal wrote:
Hi,
my naïve questions for today :
1) is graphicsmagick really better than imagemagick ?
it advertises it's twice as fast, scales better, and 'contains'
imagemagick.
This fork was created primarily for legal/licensing reasons.
2) if so, why graphicsmagick
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> 2) if so, why graphicsmagick is not widely used ?
> The migration "looks" easy. I feel i'm missing something.
Probably a simple matter of mindshare and inertia. imagemagick has
been around for longer. graphicsmagick probably hasn't done enoug
2 matches
Mail list logo
