On Tue, Oct 13, 1998 at 08:23:04PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> > I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
> > sources, we still would need another soname for this.
>
> I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
> ahead of
Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> I'm working on it. But even if I get it to compile with Debian
> sources, we still would need another soname for this.
I was going to respond to your earlier message(s), but I see you're
ahead of me. Ok, for now, I'm just going to assume that you will work
this all out
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> 'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
> versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
> possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
> stuff to do so. The c
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 04:21:05PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
> > anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
> > the two don't seem to work together at this point.
> >
> > I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-su
On Mon, Oct 12, 1998 at 04:45:35PM -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
>
> Gnome support requires Gtk 1.1 from CVS, so if you want a 1.0-based
> version you have to build it separately from the Gnome version.
Mmmh. I mailed to the gtk-- mailing list for c
On Mon, 12 Oct 1998, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> Mmmh. I just checked. The reason why gtk-- is currently w/o gnome support
> is, because I never installed libgnome-dev I think. I'm just doing it now
> and will recompile gtk-- (or better: I'll try to compile gtk-- 0.9.17) with
> gnome support.
>
> A
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> > > I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
> > > of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
>
> > Not really
Hello,
On Sun, Oct 11, 1998 at 03:28:27PM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> Havoc Pennington wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> > > I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
> > > of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
>
> > N
> "Chris" == Chris Waters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> Perhaps I'm missing something, but I don't see any way of
Chris> using gtk-- with gnome at the moment. I was going to try
Chris> packaging gnome-hack (for my own use -- I'd want to check
Chris> with the nethack maint
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
>
> 'Bout what I figured, but wouldn't it be possible to produce two
> versions which conflict? Not a perfect solution, but it would make it
> possible for people like me who want to work on gnome-related gtk--
> stuff to do so. The conflicts could be cl
Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
> > I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version
> > of gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on this?
> Not really possible without hacking Gtk-- (which can be done, but
> it's work). Gtk-- ca
On Sun, 11 Oct 1998, Chris Waters wrote:
> anything more with it), but it seems to require gtk-- and gtk1.1, and
> the two don't seem to work together at this point.
>
> I think it would really be nice to get a gnome-supporting version of
> gtk-- in before the slink freeze. Is anyone working on
12 matches
Mail list logo
