>> "MS" == Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin> I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpackage. Better
Martin> wait/contact Manoj before you get into the strange problems
Martin> we have.
I seems that a conf_prefix='debian' is needed in /etc/cvsdeb.conf.
With this line, everythi
On Sat, Oct 03, 1998 at 06:56:59PM -0400, Justin Maurer wrote:
>
> (for the purposes of this email, consider my sig my resume).
> i am an admin at a local high school. our shell server is a p233
> with 128m ram and 12gb disk. it will soon be upgraded to 256mb, and sooner
> or lat
Hi,
>>"Martin" == Martin Bialasinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> "JM" == Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> i have never used cvs-buildpackage, but would be willing to
JM> generate nightly .debs. what do people think of this?
Martin> I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpacka
>> "JM" == Justin Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JM> i have never used cvs-buildpackage, but would be willing to
JM> generate nightly .debs. what do people think of this?
I and Marcus have trouble with cvs-buildpackage. Better wait/contact
Manoj before you get into the strange problems we ha
I would recommend installing them all over. Numerous little things
changed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 18 Jun 1998, Jim Pick wrote:
> Anybody that installed the unofficial pre-release .debs I put out last
> week will probably need to install these .debs by hand (instead of
> relying on dselect) - because I didn't increment the version number.
hi,
which ones have changed? Should we install _all
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> > libjpeg have different sonames.)
> How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
> binary compatibility?
O
At 22:29 +1000 1998-04-23, Herbert Xu wrote:
>In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
>> libjpeg have different sonames.)
>
>How did this happen?
2 is the upstream soname for libpng 1.0, so we are doing the right thing there
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> I checked, Debian and Red Hat were not compatible. (e.g. libpng and
> libjpeg have different sonames.)
How did this happen? Shouldn't we try to rectify this ASAP so that there is
binary compatibility?
--
Debian GNU/Linux 1.3 is out! ( http://www.debia
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> > rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> > weeks and I think you will see more.
I've got most of the packaging for gnome 0.13 done. Unfortunately,
the gd
David Welton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 03:13:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> > rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> > weeks and I think you will see more.
> The
On Mon, Apr 20, 1998 at 03:13:24PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very
> rapidly. Jim Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more
> weeks and I think you will see more.
The thing I was wondering about is getting support in t
GNOME is currently not very stable and things are changing very rapidly. Jim
Pick is the GNOME guy for Debian. Give it a few more weeks and I think you
will see more.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
