Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
> BTW, why this problem manifest itself only on hppa? Is the c++ compiler > somewhat different or is only a chain of #ifdef and/or configure > switches that behaves differently on that arch? In woody, hppa is the only architecture that is using gcc-3.0 compilers. The other architectures are all us

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:45:39AM -0700, Randolph Chung wrote: > it needs some c++ work. For one thing it references internal libstdc++ > symbols (__STL_BEGIN_NAMESPACE, etc). Instead you should use "namespace std;", > etc. In fact I noticed the problem and I already forwarder it to the upstream

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Randolph Chung
In reference to a message from Stefano Zacchiroli, dated Apr 07: > I noticed that another package of mine, which is needed to build > gtkmathview, wasn't successfully rebuilt on hppa, namely package > "gmetadom". it needs some c++ work. For one thing it references internal libstdc++ symbols (__STL

Re: gmetadom failure on HPPA never reported in update_excuses

2002-04-07 Thread Mark Brown
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:24:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > I'm wondering why the hell "gmetadom" isn't mention as out of data on > hppa in update_excuses which reports only: It's only out of date if it was previously built for an architecture. AFAICT from madison it has never been buil