Joachim Breitner writes ("Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org"):
> Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2015, 21:47 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > (Although if a .dsc migrates between suites, the git history
> > is updated.)
>
> I don’t understand that. Is there real
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2015, 21:47 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> (Although if a .dsc migrates between suites, the git history
> is updated.)
I don’t understand that. Is there really git history changed? Or just
branches updated?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Devel
Joachim Breitner writes ("Re: git interface to snapshot.debian.org"):
> Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2015, 13:59 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > > If the answer is „Nothing is stopping, just that someone has to do it“,
> > > then I’m volunteering, as long as I c
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 25.08.2015, 13:59 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> > If the answer is „Nothing is stopping, just that someone has to do it“,
> > then I’m volunteering, as long as I can do most of it during DebConf.
>
> There are two problems that are stopping us doing this right away:
>
> - M
[ Added d-a@ldo for the dsa parts. ]
On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If the answer is „Nothing is stopping, just that someone has to do it“,
> > then I’m volunteering, as long as I can do most of it during DebConf.
>
> There are two problems that are stopping us doing this right away
Joachim Breitner writes ("git interface to snapshot.debian.org"):
> this is a follow-up to my question after the dgit talk today: It would
> be great to have a git view of the a package’s history in Debian. There
> is some possible overlap with dgit in the sense that if everyone had
> been using dg
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2015, 11:03 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> I have not thought of recreating the history of the upstream
> > versions
> > correctly. I mostly care about the “what was in Debian” aspect of
> > history, but it should not hurt to have the upstream branches as well.
> I am n
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:03:45AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> If you are just looking at adding a git interface to snapshot.d.o. then
> maybe git-annex would be more appropriate while using much less
> resources?
This is primarily targeted at serving as a common starting point for
packages tha
On Aug 20, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> I have not thought of recreating the history of the upstream versions
> correctly. I mostly care about the “what was in Debian” aspect of
> history, but it should not hurt to have the upstream branches as well.
I am not sure then that I see how these snapshot
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 20.08.2015, 05:40 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> On Aug 18, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>
> > this is a follow-up to my question after the dgit talk today: It would
> > be great to have a git view of the a package’s history in Debian. There
>
> I have spent quite a lot of time
On Aug 18, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> this is a follow-up to my question after the dgit talk today: It would
> be great to have a git view of the a package’s history in Debian. There
I have spent quite a lot of time in 2014 to figure out how to
automatically import in git repositories over 15 yea
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 15:36 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> I really like to have a DAG that represents the history of the
> package, and I don’t think it is a big complication. The bug tracker
> does it also this way, I believe, to produce these nice graphs in the
> corner.
atta
[Dropping Peter from CC]
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 15:22 +0200 schrieb Thomas Koch:
>
> > * Every source package from snapshots.d.o becomes, extracted with
> >dpkg-source -x as usual, produces a git tree object.
> >I’d probably simply ignore empty directories.
> Please add a tra
On Tuesday 18 August 2015 11:15:17 Joachim Breitner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is a follow-up to my question after the dgit talk today: It would
> be great to have a git view of the a package’s history in Debian. There
> is some possible overlap with dgit in the sense that if everyone had
> been using
14 matches
Mail list logo
