Re: can aspell drop hppa for now? (was Re: gcc-3.0 problems)

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
Ciao Domenico On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > i'm in the same situation of tomas, i'm sure that aspell won't compile > on hppa in time for woody release. it has some kind of problem with > gcc 3.0 i cannot manage and i'm not receiving any help (see bug #139515). Maybe you're as

Re: gcc-3.0 problems

2002-04-15 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If you're testing this on your x86 (or similar) platform, the undefined > references are to be expected. You can't link 2.95 and 3.0 C++ code, > and QT is 2.95 C++ code. Try working on one of the architectures in > question; they should be availabl

can aspell drop hppa for now? (was Re: gcc-3.0 problems)

2002-04-15 Thread Domenico Andreoli
dear debian mates, i'm in the same situation of tomas, i'm sure that aspell won't compile on hppa in time for woody release. it has some kind of problem with gcc 3.0 i cannot manage and i'm not receiving any help (see bug #139515). i think that leaving current aspell out of woody would be a mis

Re: gcc-3.0 problems

2002-04-15 Thread Philip Blundell
On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 22:43, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is > far too small to figure out what's going on here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032 > > and I estimate that I won't have

Re: gcc-3.0 problems

2002-04-15 Thread Daniel Jacobowitz
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:43:19PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: > My knowledge of gcc-2.95 vs gcc-3.0 intricacies and C++ specialities is > far too small to figure out what's going on here: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=140032 > > and I estimate that