On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Michael Banck wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some of my packages (e.g. nwchem, but others as well) have
> floating-point heavy testsuites becuse they are scientific computing
> applications.
>
> The current state on mips (but not mipsel) is that the testsuite
> routinely takes to
Hi,
Quoting Michael Banck (2014-12-01 14:22:12)
> 3. If 1 but not 2 are OK, should there be a way for packages to say "I should
>really be built on a buildd without softfloat"?
>
> One proposal might be to add something like "XS-Buildd-Flags: hardfloat"
> to debian/control for packages, which
2 matches
Mail list logo
