On 03/05/2018 09:51, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>>
>>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi,
FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>>> I didn't file any, an
On 03.05.2018 09:03, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
>> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mea
On 03/05/2018 08:43, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
> I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
They were filed by Lucas Nussbaum, e.g. #897518, #89
On 03.05.2018 07:29, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
I didn't file any, and I didn't see any being filed. Which ones do you mean?
Hi,
FTBFS bugs haveveen filed for packages that fail under gcc8.
Unfortunately that includes fortran packages: gfortran 8 has changed its
mod file format again, so all packages depending on other fortran libs
will fail until all are rebuilt under gfortran 8 as the default compiler.
Can we downgr
5 matches
Mail list logo