So there's some positive response. Where is a good place to pursue this
further? Is this a debian policy change?
I think there's no need for a Debian policy change to start.
You should start by finding a proper way to put the recommendation and
suggestion explanations in package control files.
* Daniel Burrows [Wed, 13 Aug 2008 08:34:18 -0700]:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> was heard to say:
> > * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> > > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
> > > description,
>
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 18:34, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> > > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
> > > description,
> >
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 11:03:50PM -0400, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>
> > Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
> >> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >>
> >> Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it a
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:57:24PM +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
>
> > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
> > description,
>
> Why not? I think (briefly) explaining some of the most rele
On Tuesday 12 August 2008 22:57, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> > I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's
> > description,
>
> Why not? I think (briefly) explaining some of the most relevant
> recommends and suggests is a perfect use
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
>> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
>> Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it appears in the
>> dsc, I don't know if XB-* appear in the deb or elsewhere.
>
> Hi Felipe,
>
> The answer i
Le Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 07:02:02PM -0400, Felipe Sateler a écrit :
> Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> Could they be added as XB-Comment:? I use XS-Comment and it appears in the
> dsc,
> I don't know if XB-* appear in the deb or elsewhere.
Hi Felipe,
The answer is only in the sources for the mome
* Shachar Or [Sun, 10 Aug 2008 18:36:35 +0300]:
> I am not suggesting this data will be put in with the package's description,
Why not? I think (briefly) explaining some of the most relevant
recommends and suggests is a perfect use of the description space. And
if more verbosity is needed, that
Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
>>>
>>> What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
>>> reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Before I re
Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
>>
>> What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
>> reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
>
> Hi,
>
> Before I read your mail, I thought that it was not
Le Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 06:36:35PM +0300, Shachar Or a écrit :
>
> What I am offering is the idea that package dependencies that are
> reccomendations or suggestions must be explained.
Hi,
Before I read your mail, I thought that it was not possible, but after
googling a bit, I found out that dp
12 matches
Mail list logo