On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 22:56:21 +0100, GCS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hamish Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
> but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Qu
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 11:56:30AM +0100, Toens Bueker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hamish Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
> > but naming something after a missile seems odd.
>
> Question is, after what the missile was named ...
If I
Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
> > > but naming something after a missile seems odd.
> >
> > Question is, after what the missile was named ...
>
> Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scud:
>
> "Scud is the NATO repo
On Wed, 2003-12-17 at 11:56, Toens Bueker wrote:
> Hamish Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
> > but naming something after a missile seems odd.
>
> Question is, after what the missile was named ...
Extract from http://en.wikipedia.org/w
Hamish Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not on the list, just follow DWN. Just a thought,
> but naming something after a missile seems odd.
Question is, after what the missile was named ...
by
Töns
--
There is no safe distance.
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> I think maybe many problems with using experimental as a playground for
> development packages could be remedied by creating a central document
> about it. Things to include might be:
> * sources.lists lines
> * using APT's preferences to pin pack
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:03:57AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >> it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
> >> `all'? Well, I'm maybe a particular case: po
Scripsit Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> However, I am not (nor do I believe a majority might be) that
> experimental should duplicate unstable, with only a few packages (the
> experimental ones) being newer. However, with the pool structure
> archive, this might not actually mean a duplicatio
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
>> `all'? Well, I'm maybe a particular case: powerpc + java ;) but it
>> could be the same with sparc + perl o
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If this would lead to more developers and beta-testers being able to
> > use experimental, then I think this would be a good idea. People might
> > upload there newer more in-development
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> John Hasler writes:
>
>> gram writes:
>>> Every new package, or every new upload?
>>
>> Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
>> Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
>> Experimenta
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
[...]
>> What I'm trying to explain is that I like the idea of an extra pool
>> with the buildd and bts but no automatic move to another pool. I
>> think, DD and people with chroot can poi
John Hasler writes:
> gram writes:
>> Every new package, or every new upload?
>
> Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
> Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
> Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would eve
gram writes:
> Every new package, or every new upload?
Perhaps every upload to Unstable should go to Experimental as well unless
Experimental already has a newer package (or the same one), but uploads to
Experimental should go to Experimental only. Nothing would ever move from
Experimental to any
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complete
> > distribution in the sense that the others are, so it doesn't really
> > deserve a codename.
>
> Isn't it possible th
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:38:37PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Neil McGovern in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I like it too :)
>
> Thanks :)
>
> > Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
> > is released as stable?
>
> That's not the way it works; "Sid" is not "Sar
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
>> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
>> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
>> unstable has with "Sid".
>
> I think that's
Re: Neil McGovern in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I like it too :)
Thanks :)
> Prehaps it could be used as a codename for the new unstable when Sarge
> is released as stable?
That's not the way it works; "Sid" is not "Sarge+1" but the never-to-be-
released development version. Think of it as "version i
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:46:27AM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Christoph Berg wrote:
> > since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> > that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> > unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 01:50:00AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> unstable has with "Sid".
I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complet
Hi,
Christoph Berg wrote:
> since we are discussing codenames for the Debian/*BSD OSs, I noticed
> that the "experimental" distribution doesn't have a codename yet, as
> unstable has with "Sid". I'd propose to call it "Scud", which is the
> Name of Sid's dog (which broke toys even worse than Sid d
21 matches
Mail list logo
