Re: elm problems

1996-08-14 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 9 Aug 1996, Mark Eichin wrote: > > Well, the question is, why does it set the value to 'w' when debian.rules > > calls the make, but not when I call make from the prompt? > > Because it's a subprocess of another make. Like the doc says: > > > Normally, you do not need to specify this optio

Re: elm problems

1996-08-09 Thread Dale Scheetz
On 8 Aug 1996, Kai Henningsen wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Miquel van Smoorenburg) wrote on 05.08.96 in <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>: > > > You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: > > > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed > > > when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call fo

Re: elm problems

1996-08-05 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Mon, 5 Aug 1996, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: > > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed > > when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make. > > > > The line in the Makefile is: > > > > cd lib; $(MAKE) $(M

Re: elm problems

1996-08-05 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
You (Dale Scheetz) wrote: > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets executed > when debian.rules calls for a make, and when I call for the same make. > > The line in the Makefile is: > > cd lib; $(MAKE) $(MJ) -(MAKEFLAGS) all ^ Could it b

Re: elm problems

1996-08-04 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sun, 4 Aug 1996, Guy Maor wrote: > On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > > > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all > > > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all >^ (no w) > > Was that a typo on your part? > No! Not a typo. This is the only difference between what gets execute

Re: elm problems

1996-08-04 Thread Guy Maor
On Fri, 2 Aug 1996, Dale Scheetz wrote: > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake -w all > cd lib; /usr/bin/pmake - all ^ (no w) Was that a typo on your part? Guy