Why should libc6-dev depend on gcc, exactly? Would it not make more sense
for it to Conflict: with gcc < 2.7.2.3-1, and let the compilers duke it
out for themselves?
--
Elie Rosenblum That is not dead which can eternal lie,
And with strange aeons even death may die.
Developer / Mercenary
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Nuno Ferreira wrote:
> Is there any reason for libc6-dev to depend on gcc and not on any
> c-compiler ?
> As it is now I can't keep egcs as my only compiler without breaking
> dependencies. Either libc6-dev should depend on c-compiler or egcs provide
> gcc. Am I missing some
On Wed, 8 Apr 1998, Nuno Ferreira wrote:
> Is there any reason for libc6-dev to depend on gcc and not on any
> c-compiler ?
> As it is now I can't keep egcs as my only compiler without breaking
> dependencies. Either libc6-dev should depend on c-compiler or egcs provide
> gcc. Am I missing some
3 matches
Mail list logo
