Re: dpkg logging

2001-09-24 Thread Massimo Dal Zotto
> > > Regardless of whether packages are using debconf, I have wondered for > > > *years* > > > why we didn't at least have the option of logging stdout and stderr from > > > everything in the install/update process. I think it's a good idea. > > > > > > Bdale > > > > I have proposed this two yea

Re: dpkg logging

2001-09-24 Thread Tomas Pospisek
On Sun, 23 Sep 2001, Massimo Dal Zotto wrote: > > > Previously Steve Greenland wrote: > > > > Stdout and stderr from the maintainer scripts. (This may be obvious, but > > >> you didn't explicitly list it.) > > > > > > No, they should use debconf. > > > > Regardless of whether packages are using de

Re: dpkg logging

2001-09-23 Thread Massimo Dal Zotto
> > Previously Steve Greenland wrote: > > > Stdout and stderr from the maintainer scripts. (This may be obvious, but > >> you didn't explicitly list it.) > > > > No, they should use debconf. > > Regardless of whether packages are using debconf, I have wondered for *years* > why we didn't at least

Re: dpkg logging

2001-09-22 Thread Bdale Garbee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wichert Akkerman) writes: > Previously Steve Greenland wrote: > > Stdout and stderr from the maintainer scripts. (This may be obvious, but >> you didn't explicitly list it.) > > No, they should use debconf. Regardless of whether packages are using debconf, I have wondered for *

Re: dpkg logging wrapper

2000-03-10 Thread Ben Collins
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 07:14:39PM -0500, Nick Cabatoff wrote: > So I've decided that I don't feel like waiting any longer for the > wishlist bug for syslog output from dpkg to be implemented. I've > written a little shell wrapper that will do this for me, and will make > it available if anyone li