"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By not answering there's no way for the submitter to know which of the above
> applies, it's an issue of not leaving users in uncertainty about what is
> going on.
>
> A simple 1 line reply is enough to remove that uncertainty:
> - this t
On Tuesday 21 March 2006 20:43, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So a mere non-reply does not, it seems to me, connote anything bad; it
> may simply mean that the bug report is complete in itself, and well
> get attention when I decide I have the attention
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Some few maintainers are obnoxious and anti-helpful. All of these
> have bugs which have had a patch attached to them for a long time
> without mantainer comment (not even 'no, this patch doesn't work
> because X'). However, not all such bugs reflec
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
So yes, I believe we need to work on the long-term "ignored" bugs. :)
Those are essentially all I work on.
It's a good thing I have a thick skin. Some maintainers are genuinely grateful
for the
assistance, and they're a pleasure to work with. (This includes the X
4 matches
Mail list logo
