Re: DebDelta Package Broken by Python3.9

2020-12-12 Thread Calum McConnell
On Wed, 2020-12-09 at 23:12 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Calum McConnell wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just wanted to note the breakage, and ask for an NMU.  I have > > prepared > > and uploaded a patch, both to Salsa and to the BTS, and it has been a > >

Re: DebDelta Package Broken by Python3.9

2020-12-09 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 12:52:30PM -0500, Calum McConnell wrote: > Hi all, > I just wanted to note the breakage, and ask for an NMU. I have prepared > and uploaded a patch, both to Salsa and to the BTS, and it has been a few > days without any response. The patch is very simple: just replace all

Re: debdelta back online

2010-09-23 Thread A Mennucc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 23/09/2010 08:59, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino ha scritto: > On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc wrote: >> due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the >> last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be b

not yet, Re: debdelta back online

2010-09-23 Thread A Mennucc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Il 22/09/2010 22:46, A Mennucc ha scritto: > due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the > last week It seems that there was another problem: there is broken pdiff in amd64/experimental, so that debmirror was not updating m

Re: debdelta back online

2010-09-23 Thread Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
On 22 September 2010 22:46, A Mennucc wrote: > due to my PC running out of disk space, no deltas were generated in the > last week (while I was absent); I found more space, so it will be back > online as soon as it generates all needed deltas. Question: How much space does debdelta take? (per arc

Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-09-04 Thread Russ Allbery
Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Florent Rougon wrote: >> > Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package. >> >> That must be cm-super. > Yup, cm-super does this trick. I once wanted to undo this and ship the > font files directly, but got quite a lot of requ

Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-09-04 Thread Norbert Preining
On Die, 04 Sep 2007, Florent Rougon wrote: > > Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package. > > That must be cm-super. Yup, cm-super does this trick. I once wanted to undo this and ship the font files directly, but got quite a lot of requests why the packages has gotten soo big. >From the ru

Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-09-04 Thread Florent Rougon
Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, I can't remember the name of the package. That must be cm-super. -- Florent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-09-03 Thread Jörg Sommer
Hi Russ, Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> BTW, I also encountered a strange "bug" : sometimes the md5sums file >> contains MD5 of files that are not shipped. This is printed as a warning >> in my server. If MD5 will become a release goal, this sh

Re: debdelta, Re: proposed release goal: DEBIAN/md5sums for all packages

2007-08-27 Thread Russ Allbery
A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BTW, I also encountered a strange "bug" : sometimes the md5sums file > contains MD5 of files that are not shipped. This is printed as a warning > in my server. If MD5 will become a release goal, this should be > corrected as well : in case, I will send bug r

Re: debdelta service back on track

2007-07-20 Thread A Mennucc
hi Mark Brown ha scritto: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:23:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > >> The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the >> compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte (that is in >> the header). This change occurred somewhere between ve

Re: debdelta service back on track

2007-07-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 11:23:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > The problem was due to a subtle change in zlib1g: in newer versions, the > compressed output has 0x02 instead of 0x00 at the 10th byte (that is in > the header). This change occurred somewhere between version 1.2.3-13 and > 1.2.3.3.dfsg-

Re: debdelta

2006-06-09 Thread A Mennucc
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote: The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old version of the .deb, and not the old .deb file itself. Is it

Re: debdelta

2006-06-01 Thread Nikita V. Youshchenko
> The command 'debdelta-upgrade' is meant to be run between 'apt-get > update' and 'apt-get upgrade'; it downloads .debdelta files and > recreate the new .deb files from them; always using the *installed* old > version of the .deb, and not the old .deb file itself. Is it safe - e.g. in case of

Re: debdelta

2006-05-31 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.05.31.1706 +0200]: > I have completed a reasonably working version of 'debdelta', a package > suite to compute differences between Debian packages. Nice. I assume you saw http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/05/msg02676.html ? > Unfortunately m