'Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:'
>
>Since the output from cron jobs is mailed anyhow, as it should be, I
>think that all cron scripts should report in as they are run, and that
>this should be made a standard. Here's why.
But if they complete successfully they should be quiet. Maybe this
would work:
s
> "Joey" == Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joey> Karl M. Hegbloom:
>> Since the output from cron jobs is mailed anyhow, as it should
>> be, I think that all cron scripts should report in as they are
>> run, and that this should be made a standard. Here's why.
Joey>
Karl M. Hegbloom:
> Since the output from cron jobs is mailed anyhow, as it should be, I
> think that all cron scripts should report in as they are run, and that
> this should be made a standard. Here's why.
I think what we need is a more intelligent run-parts, for use with the cron
jobs, that ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Karl M. Hegbloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Since the output from cron jobs is mailed anyhow, as it should be, I
> think that all cron scripts should report in as they are run, and
> that this should be made a standard. Here's why.
If you've ever administer
> "Kevin" == Kevin Dalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> "Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Q: Is anyone using `autoconf`? I wonder if it's worth learning
>> to use, and what people use it for. (I've barely glanced over
>> the manuals for it, so far.)
> Q: Is anyone using `autoconf`? I wonder if it's worth learning to
> use, and what people use it for. (I've barely glanced over the
> manuals for it, so far.)
Most main GNU packages (ie. what's on prep) have switched over to
autoconf (even gcc itself probably will, there's an effort underway,
On Sun, 18 May 1997, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> `The `tar` errors about stripping / are no big deal; I will
> 2>/dev/null them. I don't know why it cannot find
> "/etc/securetty"... anyone know? The reason I want the scripts to
> report is so I can find out which one gives that 'shell-init' error
"Karl M. Hegbloom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Q: Is anyone using `autoconf`? I wonder if it's worth learning to
> use, and what people use it for. (I've barely glanced over the
> manuals for it, so far.)
Use autoconf with automake. It's much easier to use the two in
combination. If you fee
8 matches
Mail list logo
