* Mattia Dongili
| On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
| > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
| > > Sorry. The main idea is making power management more effective, that's
| > > why earlier is better here.
| >
| > I dont see why this is the case. in the bootup
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> You don't know that actually.
> There are far too many usages to make a generic statement like that.
> I can't see nothing wrong or useless in trying to maximize battery
> power and/or minimize heat generation.
Yes of course, however there is a big diffe
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 09:35:26PM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > You don't know that actually.
> > There are far too many usages to make a generic statement like that.
> > I can't see nothing wrong or useless in trying to maximize battery
> > power an
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> > Sorry. The main idea is making power management more effective, that's
> > why earlier is better here.
>
> I dont see why this is the case. in the bootup phase the system is loaded
> a
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> Sorry. The main idea is making power management more effective, that's
> why earlier is better here.
I dont see why this is the case. in the bootup phase the system is loaded
anyway, no need to throttle it. especially since this one minute does not
cons
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 10:52:52AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-15 10:50]:
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > * Mattia Dongili
> > >
> > > | - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible in
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Mattia Dongili
>
> | - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible in the
> | boot process (IMHO)
>
> Why? This looks just like an opinion without any rationale.
Sorry. The main idea is making power managem
Hi,
* Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-07-15 10:50]:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Mattia Dongili
> >
> > | - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible in the
> > | boot process (IMHO)
> >
> > Why? This looks just like an
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 11:21:52AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Mattia Dongili
>
> | - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible in the
> | boot process (IMHO)
>
> Why? This looks just like an opinion without any rationale.
It's dumb anyway. If you wanted it set early
* Mattia Dongili
| - setting the CPUFreq policy must be done as early as possible in the
| boot process (IMHO)
Why? This looks just like an opinion without any rationale.
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky a
10 matches
Mail list logo
