Quoting David Prévot (2014-05-13 12:00:40)
> Le 13/05/2014 05:34, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
>> Also, where is a Free profile? ISTR that PDF/{A,X} creation requires
>> a profile too; I’ve used one that came as example somewhere
>> currently.
>
> The icc-profiles-free package is in main.
ghostscr
Hi,
Le 13/05/2014 05:34, Thorsten Glaser a écrit :
> On Mon, 12 May 2014, James Cloos wrote:
>
>> Note that you cannot just strip colour profiles from image containers.
>>
>> Doing so changes the output.
>>
>> You'd have to replace the profile with a Free equivilent. Or, if no
>> free equivilent
On Mon, 12 May 2014, James Cloos wrote:
> Note that you cannot just strip colour profiles from image containers.
>
> Doing so changes the output.
>
> You'd have to replace the profile with a Free equivilent. Or, if no
> free equivilent is available, edit the image to match a Free profile.
Can yo
Quoting James Cloos (2014-05-12 17:48:53)
> > "JS" == Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> JS> I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
> JS> which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
> JS> freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged to strip those ICC
>
At Sun, 11 May 2014 19:04:07 -0400,
David Prévot wrote:
> Q. Are profiles copyrighted?
>
> A. ICC has no formal position on the use of profiles. It is really up to
> the software vendor. However, since the software vendor effectively
> holds copyright on the profile (which is specified in a tag) t
Le 12 mai 2014 17:51, "James Cloos" a écrit :
>
> > "JS" == Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> JS> I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
> JS> which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
> JS> freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged to strip those
> "JS" == Jonas Smedegaard writes:
JS> I believe it does not violate DFSG to ship e.g. JFIF or GIF files
JS> which was upstream distributed with copyright-protected but not
JS> freely licensed ICC profiles, if repackaged to strip those ICC
JS> profiles.
Note that you cannot just strip colour
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
>> Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
>>> This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an ICC
>>> descriptive, rather than creative?
According to the International Color Consortium, profiles provide
con
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES
wrote:
> On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
>> can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
>
> Note that lintian detect these naked (not embede
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
> can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
Note that lintian detect these naked (not embeded) profile by default.
> Since it's something that not many people
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 02:55:09PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> > On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
> > > can embed a copyrighted ICC prof
Quoting Ben Hutchings (2014-05-10 14:37:35)
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
>> Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0] can
>> embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
> [...]
>
> This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an I
Le samedi 10 mai 2014 à 13:37 +0100, Ben Hutchings a écrit :
> On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
> > can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
> [...]
>
> This sounds like a ludicrous ove
On Sat, 2014-05-10 at 11:10 +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Jonas Smedegaard brought to my attention that an image file [0]
> can embed a copyrighted ICC profile without license.
[...]
This sounds like a ludicrous overreach of copyright. Isn't an ICC
descriptive, rather than creative? And th
14 matches
Mail list logo
