On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 04:24:20PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
[]
> > - `objdump' can handle one file at time (and not buggy).
>
> I don't understand that comment.
> ,[ Manual page objdump(1) ]
> | SYNOPSIS
> |objdump [-a|--archive-headers] <> objfile...
> | DESCRIPTION
>
* From: Manoj Srivastava
* Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:24:20 -0500
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:53:10 + (UTC), Oleg Verych
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Notes about original:
>> - `basename' doesn't work,
>
> Why? It seems to work perfectly fine here.
> __> basename
> /usr/local/src/arch
On Fri, 1 Jun 2007 20:53:10 + (UTC), Oleg Verych
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Notes about original:
> - `basename' doesn't work,
Why? It seems to work perfectly fine here.
__> basename
/usr/local/src/arch/packages--debian/kernel-package/kernel-package/debian/common/checklibs
checkli
* From: Manoj Srivastava
* Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 12:04:01 -0500
* Organization: The Debian Project
[]
> (I tend not to optimize before determining whether it is needed).
Even trailing whitespace your editor tend not to remove, before X
time ;)
[]
> If someone wants to port my simple sh
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 11:13:32 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover said:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Has this been fixed in the latest incantation?
> > Please "fix" this by adding an additional mode/view, no
On Wed, 30 May 2007 22:58:38 +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>>> What Guillem said is that checklib also indicated binaries which are
>>> lin
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> What Guillem said is that checklib also indicated binaries which are
>> linked against a library without using any of its symbols. Thus the
>> binary shouldn't have been
On Wed, 30 May 2007 18:28:43 +0200, Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Manoj,
> On Wed, 30 May 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> When checklibs was run, it would report libbar-dev, libbaz-dev,
>> unneeded; looking at foo libfoo-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at
>> bar libfoo-dev, l
Hi Manoj,
On Wed, 30 May 2007, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> When checklibs was run, it would report
> libbar-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at foo
> libfoo-dev, libbaz-dev, unneeded; looking at bar
> libfoo-dev, libbar-dev, unneeded; looking at baz
>
> End result: Uneedded
On Wed, 30 May 2007 17:59:15 +0300, Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
>> > hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>>
>> > madcoder mentioned in
>> > http://list
On Wed, 2007-05-30 at 02:19:33 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc said:
> > hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>
> > madcoder mentioned in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
> > intention of getting the ch
Hi,
On Thu, 24 May 2007 20:26:00 +0200, A Mennucc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> hi what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
> madcoder mentioned in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.htmlof the
> intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress?
Lucas Nussbaum ha scritto:
> On 24/05/07 at 21:22 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
>>> maybe the source code may be uploaded in the alioth project
>> that would be good yes.
>
> Feel free to use the collab-qa alioth project for tha
On 24/05/07 at 21:22 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
> >
> > madcoder mentioned in
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.html
> > of the intention of gettin
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 09:22:12PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>
> We're still waitinf for the lufthansa machines to set it up :/
>
That remembers me that having some bits about that would be nice.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 08:26:00PM +0200, A Mennucc wrote:
> hi
>
> what about http://rerun.lefant.net/checklib/ ?
>
> madcoder mentioned in
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00822.html
> of the intention of getting the checklib service up again: any progress?
We're still waiti
16 matches
Mail list logo
