Quoting Anthony DeRobertis (2015-11-20 03:06:20)
> On 08/05/2015 07:11 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> Bas Wijnen debian.org> writes:
>>
>>> Certificates are placed in /etc/ssl/certs/.
>> No, in /etc/ssl. /etc/ssl/certs/ is for Root CA certificates *only*.
>
> (sorry for responding to a very old mes
On 08/05/2015 07:11 AM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Bas Wijnen debian.org> writes:
Certificates are placed in /etc/ssl/certs/.
No, in /etc/ssl. /etc/ssl/certs/ is for Root CA certificates *only*.
(sorry for responding to a very old message)
Really? I've often put the local machine's cert(s) in
On 05/08/15 13:11, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Bas Wijnen debian.org> writes:
>
>> Certificates are placed in /etc/ssl/certs/.
>
> No, in /etc/ssl. /etc/ssl/certs/ is for Root CA certificates *only*.
>
Now that Let's Encrypt is progressing (they are almost in beta[1] now),
I thought it would be
Bas Wijnen debian.org> writes:
> Certificates are placed in /etc/ssl/certs/.
No, in /etc/ssl. /etc/ssl/certs/ is for Root CA certificates *only*.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 05:44:06PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Some ideas that pop up in my mind:
> - Would be yet another location of privacy leak in Debian, where the
> system automatically calls "home" to some more commercial than
> com
Quoting Daniel Pocock (2015-08-02 18:49:16)
> On 02/08/15 17:44, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
>> - Would be yet another location of privacy leak in Debian, where the
>> system automatically calls "home" to some more commercial than
>> community organisations.
>
> This would not be automatic.
On 02/08/15 17:44, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 16:37 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>> I apologize for not being more explicit, this is the sort of thing I
>> was thinking too, it wouldn't be up to dpkg or postinst to guess or
>> insist on a particular CA. Rather, it w
On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 16:37 +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I apologize for not being more explicit, this is the sort of thing I
> was thinking too, it wouldn't be up to dpkg or postinst to guess or
> insist on a particular CA. Rather, it would be an optional prompt
> and there would be some scri
On 2 August 2015 16:20:51 CEST, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>Quoting Marco d'Itri (2015-08-02 12:36:19)
>> On Aug 02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>
>>> Does anybody prefer to see packages create certificates during
>>> postinst or is there any preference not to try that and let people
>do
>>> so manually
Quoting Marco d'Itri (2015-08-02 12:36:19)
> On Aug 02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> Does anybody prefer to see packages create certificates during
>> postinst or is there any preference not to try that and let people do
>> so manually?
> There is no point in trying to get a certificate from letsen
On Aug 02, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Does anybody prefer to see packages create certificates during postinst
> or is there any preference not to try that and let people do so manually?
There is no point in trying to get a certificate from letsencrypt every
time you install a package if you already
On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Does anybody prefer to see packages create certificates during postinst
> or is there any preference not to try that and let people do so manually?
I certainly would not expect packages to call out to the Internet in
this situation, at least
12 matches
Mail list logo
