Re: build question

2000-09-06 Thread Roland Bauerschmidt
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > there if they are destined for woody? should i start building on a > woody box? You could do source only uploads. Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PRO

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Arthur Korn
David Starner schrieb: > On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > > > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > > > there if they are destined for woody? should i start b

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > If possible, your package should depend on packages in potato only. > Then users won't be forced to install other unstable packages, > just to try out your package. What if your package won't compile against the libraries in wood

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread David Starner
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 01:29:02AM +0200, Tom Cato Amundsen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > > i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, > > or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, > > please. > > >

Re: build question

2000-09-05 Thread Tom Cato Amundsen
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 07:19:11PM +, michael d. ivey wrote: > i'm a new maintainer, and maybe this is better directed at -mentors, > or maybe it's in the docs somewhere...if so, just point me that way, > please. > > my main server is potato. is it "bad" for me to be building packages > there