Gerfried Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 09:50]:
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> >> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
> >> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged t
* Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-29 09:50]:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
>> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed
>> by an upload to unstable. Not unco
Hi ..
On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 05:45:29PM +1000, Brian May wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
>> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed
>> by an upload to unst
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 08:48:31AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
> How to do this? They should be rather be tagged than be closed
> by an upload to unstable. Not unconditionally, of course. The version
> of the bugreport s
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 02:48, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> What we need is a change here: Bugs should just be closed in unstable.
Have fun hacking the debbugs code, and good luck emerging from the
experience a sane man :)
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> [snip uselss crap]
Duh, no shit. Tell us what we don't know.
Why don't you get off your soap box, off your ass, and actually make what you
suggest work?
6 matches
Mail list logo
