Ossama Othman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Can the 2.1/2.2 kernels handle a gigabyte of memory?
Yes.
For more than 1GB, go to:
http://humbolt.geo.uu.nl/Linux-MM/more_than_1GB.html
There was a lot of discussion about this on the linux-kernel mailing
list lately.
> Also, I remember reading
Hi again,
> 2.0.x maxes out at 2^30-2^26 = 1006632960 bytes, or 960MB, of RAM.
>
> Thus, you'll wanna use "mem=960M".
>
> You can also adjust some headers (I forget which) to expand the kernel
> memory / virtual memory split (it is adjustable, and it defaults to 1GB/3GB).
Can the 2.1/2.2 kernel
Hi Robert,
> # dd if=resc1440.bin of=/dev/fd0
> # mount -t msdos /dev/fd0 /mnt
> # cd /mnt
> # rm linux
> # cp /place/i/have/my/working/kernel linux
> # ./rdev.sh
> # cd /
> # umount /mnt
>
> Yes, the rdev.sh script does require that you mount the disk on /mnt.
>
> Make sure your rescue disk con
Ossama Othman wrote:
>The machines both have two Adaptec 7890 and one Adaptec 7860 SCSI chipsets
>installed. Each machine also has a gigabyte of memory and four Intel
>Pentium II Xeons installed. In order to get RedHat to work we had to fool
>the kernel into thinking that it had less than a gig o
4 matches
Mail list logo
