Bill Mitchell writes:
>
> Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > If this is more of your file-granularity stuff I don't want to hear
> > it, I'm afraid.
>
> It's not, and I know you don't. You're welcome to ignore anything I
> do say about that.
I'm glad we're being nice to each other now :)
Andr
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: bogo-1.2-1 released"):
[.. downside comments ..]
> [.. disagreement ..]
[.. upside comments ..]
> I'm confused. Here you're making my point for me.
I wasn't arguing, really. I was remarking on
Bill Mitchell writes ("Re: bogo-1.2-1 released"):
> From a user/installer point of view, it seems unhelpful to combine them.
> It sounds like this would hide theinfo for each small package which would
> be available as Description/Extended description if each was packaged
> s
Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Karl Ferguson writes ("bogo-1.2-1 released"):
> > Well, it's a tough job, but someone's got to be low enough to do some
> > small Debian packages :-) One day when I feel more confident I'll do
> > some real packages
>
> Does anyone else think it would be
> Karl Ferguson writes ("bogo-1.2-1 released"):
> > Well, it's a tough job, but someone's got to be low enough to do some
> > small Debian packages :-) One day when I feel more confident I'll do
> > some real packages
>
> Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to combine some of
> these
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Karl Ferguson writes ("bogo-1.2-1 released"):
> > Well, it's a tough job, but someone's got to be low enough to do some
> > small Debian packages :-) One day when I feel more confident I'll do
> > some real packages
>
> Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to combi
> > As I said in my reply too, I think it'll be a good idea as well. I'll make
> > a systool package and encorporate the utilities I've just released in it.
> > Sound good?
>
> Yes :-).
>
>
> Peter
Ok, that's settled then.
IanM: Could you delete the procinfo, memtest and bogo packages before
> > Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to combine some of
> > these very small packages together into a somewhat larger one ?
>
> Yes, that's a good idea. There could be separate packages for system
> tools (memtest, bogomips, ...), for console tools (open, vlock, ...)
> and for other
Karl Ferguson writes ("bogo-1.2-1 released"):
> Well, it's a tough job, but someone's got to be low enough to do some
> small Debian packages :-) One day when I feel more confident I'll do
> some real packages
Does anyone else think it would be a good idea to combine some of
these very small pac
>
> With all due respect, I fail to see any value in being able to calculate
> BogoMips from the command line.
>
> The uptime command provides accurate system load information in a much
> more useful format. The BogoMips calculation just wastes CPU cycles, which
> is certainly not something you
With all due respect, I fail to see any value in being able to calculate
BogoMips from the command line.
The uptime command provides accurate system load information in a much
more useful format. The BogoMips calculation just wastes CPU cycles, which
is certainly not something you would want to d
11 matches
Mail list logo
