Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:45:04PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>> Actually, I would find it significantly easier to borrow code from Wine
>> to do registry parsing and run a tool against a Windows partition
>> mounted read-only to extract the information we need, than I would to
>> write a Wind
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 12:24:56PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> > > the
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> Are VFAT partitions still common? I thought Windows 2000 and XP both
> used NTFS by default. And last time I tried (about a year ago, I
> think) mounting NTFS read-write on Linux was still flaky.
But ISTR that _file_overwrite_ sup
> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
> details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
> given table above).
> 2/we want one of the following:-
> A/ to be able to insert a floppy disk into
> our "a" drive , turn on the computer,
> the comp
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:08:17PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> > the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry
> > from there?
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:31:11AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Why make it a separate program that runs under Windows? Why not mount
> the Windows partition from the Linux installer, and read the registry
> from there?
Because it's easier for Windows to read its own registry and write a
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> whi
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 07:04:46PM +0200, Richard Braakman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
was heard to say:
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> > which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, m
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:30:10PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a
> loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that
> would only be nee
On Mon, 9 Dec 2002 02:30, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Another idea: why not support an installation in an ext2 filesystem
> which is really a big file on a Windows VFAT partition, mounted using a
> loopback device? That would do away with all the partitioning; that
> would only be needed when the us
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 04:22:52PM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> Hmmm, ok, on 2nd thought there's modems, printers, and old ISA cards.
> Anything else?
What about configurations for IP, DNS, mail and news? I don't see why
it would be limited to hardware detection.
Richard
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 02:25:19PM +, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
On Sun, 08 Dec 2002, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> which will be required b
On Sun, 2002-12-08 at 15:25, John Lines wrote:
> Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
> new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
> started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
> which will be re
Reading the thread on installation from Windows - one thing which might help
new Linux users would be a program which they ran from Windows before they
started, which would record all the things Windows knows about their system
which will be required by a Linux installation.
This could include inf
Hi,
> 4/ many of us millions would very much like to have
> the option of using both systems on our computer.
They actually have.
> 1/ we don't want to have to know the technical
> details of how to get to the step4/ above (in the
> given table above).
This is being worked on. A lon
Hello,
Am 03:07 2002-12-06 -0800 hat [EMAIL PROTECTED] geschrieben:
>
>
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
I have a vbs Virus taken from 'I-love-You.vbs'
It do nothing, until it is 01:00 CET. Then it w
Please, first learn how to use your mail software. Your mails are just a
pity to read.
Le sam 07/12/2002 à 10:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
> Thank you all for your interesting
> analysis to "setup.exe"
> I am sorry to disappoint Craig Im
> not a Troll.
Yes, you are a troll. The title of yo
also sprach [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.12.06.1207 +0100]:
> The Linux "kernal" can't be so
> foreign a language that it can be
> copied ???
you are using Windows, don't forget that. it's impaired. you need
control over vital sectors of the hdd, which Windoze
inf^H^H^Hprotects.
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 07:19:33PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> BTW: Linux has a special filesystem called "umsdos" which would allow
> you to store Windows and Linux files on the same "C:" partition, but
> this is not the optimal way to run Linux, so Debian does not support
> umsdos-based install
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Consider two computers one with
> Windows and the other with Linux.
> They only differ in that the machine
> code written on the respective hard
> drives is diferent.I am certain that
> a simple file copying "setup.exe"
> program can move all co
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:07:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [...]
> I am trying to avoid the problem which I have of needing a degree in
> Rocket Science to even see anything on my computer which originates
> from the blessed Linus "kernal". Who in this world can actually read
> hexadecima
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 12:06:34PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
>> The Linux "kernal" can't be so foreign a language that it can be
>> copied ??? All code that the computer uses must come from a bios chip
>> or the hard drive not from outer space. I am trying to avoid the
>> problem which I have
On Fri, Dec 06, 2002 at 03:07:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple request for an DOS or Windows based
> "SETUP.EXE" program which loads Linux onto my hard drive, would lead
> me to thick I was asking for the combination to Fort Knox.
No, it's because you've mis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 06 December 2002 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
> would lead me to thick I was asking
> for the combin
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
What you want is not a technical problem. So now, that you know it's
feasible you have at least the following altern
On Fri, 6 Dec 2002 12:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The response I got to a simple
> request for an DOS or Windows
> based "SETUP.EXE" program which
> loads Linux onto my hard drive,
> would lead me to thick I was asking
> for the combination to Fort Knox.
The combination to Fort Knox is 78
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002, Luke Woods wrote:
> the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
>
> nuff said.
>
> Luke
>
> p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
>
Because it does not have line numbers ;)
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin,
the linux distro you seek exists. its called windows xp.
nuff said.
Luke
p.s. qbasic is the programming language for stupid people.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, December 03, 2002 9:29 AM
Subject: bill gates linux
>
> I am not at totally stupid
> p
On Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I am not at totally stupid
> person.I have written a 60k
> byte qbasic application program.
Are these two statements related?
> I have watched with interest over
> the past few years the development
> of Linux.I believe it will really
> never g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] dijo:
> What is required is in effect a Windows,xx or DOS based SETUP.EXE
> program that would permanently install Linux on ones hard drive
> including a Partition to allow dual Windows,XX and Linux to coexist
> together.
Just to mention a few Debian-based efforts:
http://www.kno
32 matches
Mail list logo
