"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Without going down a semantic rathole, I'm happy to disagree here. In
> any case, it was meant more of a good-natured (if slightly vicious)
> jab against a program I love and am very critical of. I apologize if
> it came out wrong.
Er, no problem. I
> "Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> IMHO, it's a bug if it doesn't work efficiently without specialized
> >> assistance from shell completions.
> >
> > Absolutely. The fact that such a workaround is essential is a sign of
> > serious problem. :) tla has those in force. :)
>
> Gee
"Benj. Mako Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> IMHO, it's a bug if it doesn't work efficiently without specialized
>> assistance from shell completions.
>
> Absolutely. The fact that such a workaround is essential is a sign of
> serious problem. :) tla has those in force. :)
Geez can you be a bi
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 10:40:47AM -0400, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> > >
> > > > That sounds very nice indeed. If that pans out, and you also fix the UI
> > > > issues (by which I mean I have to type approximately three times as many
> > > > charac
4 matches
Mail list logo
