[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Mar 16, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
> > because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page
> > is update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils
On Mar 16, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
> because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page
> is update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs,
> procps, ppp, pppconfig, sets
On Wednesday 16 March 2005 20:12, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> What would really win, of course, is "Architecture: !hurd-i386". But
> negative declarations are currently not yet supported. They should
> be.
Research the problem (especially on
http://lists.debian.org/debian-{dpkg,release}/, but
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 11:12:29AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
> To be in SCC, under the proposal we're all discussing, an arch must
> have build 50% of the archive, not counting arch-specific packages.
>
> The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
> because the
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> > The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
> > because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page is
> > update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs, procps,
> >
Thomas Bushnell BSG writes:
> The Debian Hurd project has another category that should be excluded
> because they are kernel-specific. (The current list on the web page is
> update, makedev, ld.so, modconf, modutils, netbase, pcmcia-cs, procps,
> ppp, pppconfig, setserial.
Pppconfig is not kernel
6 matches
Mail list logo
