On Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:52:32 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
[...]
> And if you are maintaining packages which have extension libraries,
> please rebuild and upload it to Debian.
>
>
Please file bugs against extensions; lots of people don't read d-d.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2005/06/30, at 4:11, David Moreno Garza wrote:
>> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
>> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> Any specific idea why not use 'i486-linux-gnu'? I've seen it was already
> reported on the bug you ment
Hi Yamada-san,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:52:32AM +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
> ref:
>
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 00:52 +0900, akira yamada wrote:
> Dear Ruby users
>
>
> I uploaded ruby1.8_1.8.2-9 and ruby1.9_1.9.0+20050623-2 to Debian.
> In this release for ix86, arch-name of ruby1.8/1.9 was changed to
> /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i486-linux from /usr/lib/ruby/1.[89]/i386-linux.
Any speci
4 matches
Mail list logo
