olly@lfix.co.uk (Oliver Elphick) wrote on 27.04.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> unix.hensa.ac.uksunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk
> wget http:1.97KB/s1.90KB/s
> wget ftp: 5.19KB/s5.42KB/s
> ftp: 4.2 Kbytes/sec
Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First off, I assume Oliver is testing single files. Secondly wget must
> recreate a data channel when using ftp anyhow so the fact that wget is
> only using HTTP/1.0 would not be relavent.
Oh.
How.. tacky.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Sun, 26 Apr 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
> Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > unix.hensa.ac.uksunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk
> > wget http: 1.97KB/s1.90KB/s
> > wget ftp: 5.19KB/s5.42KB/s
>
> wget uses HTTP/1.0, so must establish a new
Oliver Elphick wrote:
> unix.hensa.ac.uksunsite.doc.ic.ac.uk
> wget http:1.97KB/s1.90KB/s
> wget ftp: 5.19KB/s5.42KB/s
wget uses HTTP/1.0, so must establish a new connection for
every file transfered via http, b
[I originally thought this was a problem with apt, but it appears to be a
problem with HTTP transfers in general, so I am putting it on the devel list.]
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
>> The HTTP transfer method now used by apt is slow and does not use all the
>> bandwidth available. By compariso
5 matches
Mail list logo