On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 00:58:55 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Update list.
>
> bti: #588235
The new upstream release with oauth support is ready for upload, it
just waits for liboauth (#581601).
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE4
: :'
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 15:52:44 -0400
Hideki Yamane wrote:
Update list.
bisho: not affected
choqok: OK
gtwitter: removed from Debian archive
libmojito0: RM request from maintainer
libnet-twitter-lite-perl: OK
libnet-twitte
On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 15:52:44 -0400, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> status update for twitter client/library OAuth support in Debian
> bti: #588235
Upstream is aware, and work in an oauth branch has started.
Cheers,
gregor
--
.''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ -- GPG key IDs: 0x8649AA06, 0x00F3CFE
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:40:07 +0900
Hideki Yamane wrote:
status update for twitter client/library OAuth support in Debian
And ITP:liboauth may be able to solve this problem in some package
(thanks for information, Luke Cycon)
see http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=581601
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:08:02 +0200
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Okay, I propose once python-twitter package should be removed from testing.
> > If we're lucky :), it'll be in squeeze, again.
>
> You should probably file a RC bug so that it doesn’t migrate again
> without being fixed first.
Tha
Le mercredi 30 juin 2010 à 12:47 +0900, Hideki Yamane a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
> Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> > Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
> > commit is
> > from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth.
> > Also t
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:47:45 -0300
Mauro Lizaur wrote:
> Python-twitter doesn't seem to be on shape to be released, since the last
> commit is
> from 06/13 and there isn't a single line regarding oauth.
> Also the author from oauth-python-twitter (which can be integrated in some
> way with
2010-06-28, Hideki Yamane:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (got with "apt-cache search
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> plasma-widgets-addons (microblog widget)
OAuth support added upstream:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=242048
Cheers,
Marcus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkwqP1sACgkQXjXn6T
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 08:54:55PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> > Waiting for qoauth [1].
>
> Thanks! I haven't heard about it. Choqok author seems to make a fork from
> that, see http://momeny.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/kde-oauth/#comment-248
There's no need for a qoauth fork. The change is be
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Thanks, added. Is plasma part of KDE, right? If so, as Carlos suggests
> qoauth (or forked one) will help that if someone would package it, I guess.
Noah Meyerhans (choqok maintainer) took over the qoauth ITP some days
ago, so I'm sure th
Hi Sune,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 15:25:10 + (UTC)
Sune Vuorela wrote:
> plasma-widgets-addons (microblog widget)
Thanks, added. Is plasma part of KDE, right? If so, as Carlos suggests
qoauth (or forked one) will help that if someone would package it, I guess.
--
Regards,
Hideki Yamane
Hi Carlos,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:28:00 +0200
Carlos Galisteo wrote:
> Waiting for qoauth [1].
Thanks! I haven't heard about it. Choqok author seems to make a fork from
that, see http://momeny.wordpress.com/2010/06/09/kde-oauth/#comment-248
>Please, notice that oauth may imply some issues ab
Hi,
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 19:21:52 +0200
Luk Claes wrote:
>Will they also not be usable anymore with identi.ca and similar twitter
>like services? If not, there is no reason to have them dropped AFAICS.
I haven't known about similar services are there, thanks!
However, at least remove "twitter"
On 06/28/2010 04:40 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
Will they also not be usable anymore with identi.ca and similar twitt
Hi,
Am Montag, den 28.06.2010, 23:40 +0900 schrieb Hideki Yamane:
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (go
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> qwit: needs update. It should be newer than 1.1-beta.
Waiting for qoauth [1].
> Any comments are welcome. Thanks.
Please, notice that oauth may imply some issues about distributing
application secret tokens [2]. Upstream and maintainers s
On 2010-06-28, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I reported in Bug#587420, all twitter client should support OAuth since
> twitter
> will discard basic auth. If they not, we should drop them from Squeeze
> release.
>
> These lists are assumed to be affected packages (got with "apt-cache searc
18 matches
Mail list logo
