also sprach Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.02.0830 +0200]:
> Why do you replace initramfs-tools and not just initramfs-tools << 0.60
> (or 0.63 as is the version you conflict with)?
Mh, that's a human error. Thanks for spotting it.
> Also, depending on makedev | udev would be more
martin f krafft wrote:
This release depends heavily on the initramfs-tools dudes fixing
#367567 with their next (>> 0.60) release. In the mean time, you
*can* try mdadm 2.5 by taking a screwdriver and loosening those
screws that make the conflict on initramfs-tools (<= 0.60)
necessary:
Why do
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.01.0240 +0200]:
> I have uploaded mdadm 2.4.1-2 to unstable (should be ready for
> (non-production) use, no *big* changes), and 2.5-1 to experimental
> (*big* changes, works in my case, YMMV).
-3 and -2 are now there, respectively, fixing FT
3 matches
Mail list logo
