On May 28, 12:55pm, Joey Hess wrote:
> Buddha Buck:
> > Personally, I question placing them in the main distribution at all
> > (including non-free and contrib). I have nothing wrong with the
> > contents (if available, it would be installed on my system rather
> > quickly), but rather the unwa
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Look at it this way: I don't think any of the man pages mention ASR at all.
> So the only person who is going to connect ASR with the package is someone
> who looks at the package description. Who's most likly to do t
Buddha Buck:
> Personally, I question placing them in the main distribution at all
> (including non-free and contrib). I have nothing wrong with the
> contents (if available, it would be installed on my system rather
> quickly), but rather the unwanted publicity it could cause.
I packaged up s
> I am about to create a package (in fact it's ready) with
> alt.sysadmin.recovery man pages (things like lart, sysadmin, etc.)
> So, first of all I'd like to check if there are no other people working on
> it and if the others think this should be put into Debian.
> And another question - I'm not
On May 26, 10:15am, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Alexander> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done
> Alexander> for... Showing up with man...
>
> Alexander> Nobody will die because of that... Hopefully.
>
> Fine, as long as the desciption field is clear that these
> ``manual pages
'J.H.M.Dassen wrote:'
>
>On May 26, Manoj Srivastava wrote
>> Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
>
>Check out the manpages at http://www.bofh.net/man/:
>lart - Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool - use a lart to adjust lusers'
>attitudes
>sysadmin - responsible f
Hi,
>>"Alexander" == Alexander Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alexander> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done
Alexander> for... Showing up with man...
Alexander> Nobody will die because of that... Hopefully.
Fine, as long as the desciption field is clear that these
``man
On May 26, 1:36pm, Alexander Koch wrote:
> > But doesn't it belong to /usr/man, if it's in groff format?
>
> Such pearls of wisdom need to be what they're done for... Showing up with
> man...
I wrote it once, but it apparently went into wrong place :^)
We're not talking about the location in fil
On 26 May 1997, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Oh, I see. Well, this stuff is then like a joke book, in
> manual page format, and I think that humor should still fit in under
> the doc category (If I remember correctly, that is where the
> consensus was to place books like the bible or older book
Hi,
Oh, I see. Well, this stuff is then like a joke book, in
manual page format, and I think that humor should still fit in under
the doc category (If I remember correctly, that is where the
consensus was to place books like the bible or older books whose
copyrights have expired)
On May 26, Manoj Srivastava wrote
> Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
Check out the manpages at http://www.bofh.net/man/:
lart - Luser Attitude Readjustment Tool - use a lart to adjust lusers'
attitudes
sysadmin - responsible for everything imaginable that
Hi,
Would the doc directory be better for man pages? Why games?
manoj
confused
--
"Civilisation is the art of living in towns of such size that
everyone does not know everyone else." Julian Jaynes
Manoj Srivastava mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mobile, Alabama USA
12 matches
Mail list logo
