Re: a script to help maintainers with renames for gcc packages

2015-08-13 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Steve Langasek (2015-08-13 03:38:00) > - if using d-shlibs (which... don't. thanks), you need to pass a >--v5 option to it in debian/rules. Not sure what is meant by that parenthesis. If d-shlibs is somehow an antipattern then please clarify¹. - Jonas ¹ I am genuinely puzzled -

Re: a script to help maintainers with renames for gcc packages

2015-08-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Steve Langasek (2015-08-12): > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Thanks! Does the hazardous sed call touching debian/rules now account > > for the dh_makeshlibs call(s) that might have been missed previously? > > I don't know about dh_makeshlibs calls specifical

Re: a script to help maintainers with renames for gcc packages

2015-08-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 03:14:18AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Hi Steve, > Steve Langasek (2015-08-12): > > At Matthias's suggestion, I'm attaching here a script that I've been > > using in Ubuntu to trigger library package transitions for the g++5 > > ABI change. It needs a bit of tuning to

Re: a script to help maintainers with renames for gcc packages

2015-08-12 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi Steve, Steve Langasek (2015-08-12): > At Matthias's suggestion, I'm attaching here a script that I've been > using in Ubuntu to trigger library package transitions for the g++5 > ABI change. It needs a bit of tuning to be usable in Debian (for > instance, you probably don't want to pull the s