Carlos Laviola schrieb:
> I hope that's a joke, because, based _solely_ on that
> comparison table, the reason one should use snarf over wget is
> because it has a cool progressbar.
snarf is also a lot smaller than wget. (According to the chart)
ciao, 2ri
--
They are really completely different
On 04-May-2001 Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> retitle 86871 ITA: snarf -- command line URL grabber
>
>>snarf (#86871), orphaned 71 days ago
>> Description: A command-line URL grabber
>
> I'll take this. It's one of the first packages I install on a new
> system, and I use it all the time.
retitle 86871 ITA: snarf -- command line URL grabber
>snarf (#86871), orphaned 71 days ago
> Description: A command-line URL grabber
I'll take this. It's one of the first packages I install on a new
system, and I use it all the time. Plus I know the guy who wrote it.
And anybody who t
3 matches
Mail list logo