-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2004 05:53 PM, Adeodato Simó wrote:
| albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
| iiuc, base should be self-contained (that is, packages in base must
| not depend on packages outside it).
well, logrotate is almo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/2004 01:10 AM, Martin Schulze wrote:
| Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
|
|>Hi,
|>
|>I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
|>scripts and not logrotate.
|
|
| Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 09:39:51PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:36 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Please send me the patch.
> Honestly, looking at sysklogd's bug list doesn't make people get the
> impression that it makes sense to file patches against
On Mon, 1 Nov 2004 15:29:36 +0100, Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Please send me the patch.
Honestly, looking at sysklogd's bug list doesn't make people get the
impression that it makes sense to file patches against the sysklogd
package.
Greetings
Marc
--
---
On Thu, Oct 28, 2004 at 10:53:12AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Clemens Schwaighofer [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:02:44 +0900]:
> > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > scripts and not logrotate.
>
> albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> > > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > > scripts and not logrotate.
> >
> > Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 21:42:09 +0400, "Nikita V. Youshchenko"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> and before anybody asks, I already but all the things into logrotate. I
>> just curious why its not there from beginning.
>
>With current default configuration, if I add some more log files
>info /etc/syslog.c
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > scripts and not logrotate.
>
> Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
> uses savelog.
It seems
> and before anybody asks, I already but all the things into logrotate. I
> just curious why its not there from beginning.
With current default configuration, if I add some more log files
info /etc/syslog.conf (e.g. to catch localN facilities), they get rotation
automatically. Can the same be achi
* Clemens Schwaighofer [Wed, 27 Oct 2004 23:02:44 +0900]:
> Hi,
> I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> scripts and not logrotate.
albeit both are Priority: important, sysklogd is Section: base. and,
iiuc, base should be self-contained (that is, packages in base
Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> scripts and not logrotate.
Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
uses savelog.
> Because it uses its own scripts, its rather tricky to configure. Eg its
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
