Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 19:37:26 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" ha scritto:
> > * 1 package has temporary dependency screwup
> What specifically does "temporary dependency screwup" mean?
http://people.debian.org/~dktrkranz/scons-2.0/depwait/gtkrsync_1.0.4-sid-i386-20100604-075618.22.log
gtkrsync req
Hi,
On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 16:30 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> So, I rebuilt reverse dependencies of SCons to spot some problems, and I
> published my results online. Here is a brief summary:
>
> * 58 packages build-depending on SCons
> * 53 packages built successfully (2 of them needed sourceful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il giorno Fri, 04 Jun 2010 13:12:52 -0400
Felipe Sateler ha scritto:
> Does SCons finally support SONAMES or do we still have to manually do
> that? I don't see any reference to that in the release text.
I don't think so. I remember I've seen a requ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/06/10 10:30, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SCons developers are close to release new major release of SCons, which
> started to deprecate some obsolete function and dropped support for
> Python code older than 2.4. Full release notes can
4 matches
Mail list logo
