Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-22 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-05-14 23:08:09, schrieb Hamish Moffatt: > Without wishing to join the mob, > > e) it's difficult to install versions of packages not available from > your regular sources.list. For example if you build a new (version of a) > library package and then an application that uses it and want to

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-22 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-05-14 18:19:56, schrieb Carlo Segre: > even better, just put the pbuilder/result in a user-readable and writable > volume (/home/pbuilder for example) and run pbuilder as a normal user all > the time. This is what I do. Greetings Michelle Konzack -- Linux-User #280138 with the L

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke...

2006-05-15 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:47:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: >> On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:25AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: >> > Right solution is to use pbuilder, which will: >> > >> > a) always ensure that package can be built using unstable >>

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 13:59 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Nope, it's not :-), just add: > > > > BINDMOUNTS="/var/cache/pbuilder/result" > > > > and put hook script somewhere: > > > > # cat /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D70results > > #!/bin/sh > > cd /var/cache/pbuilder/result/ > >

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Junichi Uekawa
Hi, > > Nope, it's not :-), just add: > > BINDMOUNTS="/var/cache/pbuilder/result" > > and put hook script somewhere: > > # cat /var/cache/pbuilder/hooks/D70results > #!/bin/sh > cd /var/cache/pbuilder/result/ > /usr/bin/dpkg-scanpackages . /dev/null >> /var/cache/pbuilder/result/Packages > /us

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Carlo Segre
On Sun, 14 May 2006, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: ... e) it's difficult to install versions of packages not available from your regular sources.list. For example if you build a new (version of a) library package and then an application that uses

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 04:40:43PM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: ... > > e) it's difficult to install versions of packages not available from > > your regular sources.list. For example if you build a new (version of a) > > library package and then an application that uses it and want to upload > > both

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 23:08 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:47:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:25AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > > > Right solution is to use pbuilder, which will: > > > > > > a) always ensure that package can be built u

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (extra archive source set up)

2006-05-14 Thread Osamu Aoki
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:08:09PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:47:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: ... > Without wishing to join the mob, > > e) it's difficult to install versions of packages not available from > your regular sources.list. For example if you build a

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 11:47:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:25AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > > Right solution is to use pbuilder, which will: > > > > a) always ensure that package can be built using unstable > > b) keep your build environment clean > > c) keep

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 14 mai 2006 à 11:47 +0200, Wouter Verhelst a écrit : > d) take much longer to build your package; the exact factor depends on >the size of the package, but a factor 3 isn't too uncommon for >smaller packages, which isn't very interesting in cases where you >need to do a lot

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Ondrej Sury
On Sun, 2006-05-14 at 11:47 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:25AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:54 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: > > > Is there a way to tell deborphan to follow the build-dependencies > > > of a set of source packages? I know about

Re: Use pbuilder, Luke... (Was: cleaning up lib*-dev packages?)

2006-05-14 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 10:00:25AM +0200, Ondrej Sury wrote: > On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:54 -0400, Eric Cooper wrote: > > Is there a way to tell deborphan to follow the build-dependencies > > of a set of source packages? I know about deborphan's keep file, > > but that's too tedious to keep up-to-d